Pakistan’s T20I Batting Woes Revealed by Stats Since 2021

The Pakistan cricket team is grappling with power-hitting challenges, particularly in T20 Internationals, despite being a well-settled side in the format. Notably, they have achieved bowling records but face a critical test in the upcoming 5-match T20I series against New Zealand, followed by the T20 World Cup 2024.

Debating Pakistan’s T20I Batting Order

The ongoing debate centers on the efficacy of individual batters and their corresponding strike rates. A thorough analysis is necessary to understand how players’ positions impact their performance and, consequently, the team’s overall outcomes in T20I matches.

Batting Order Dynamics

Pakistan has experimented with various combinations, occasionally promoting all-rounders to boost the run rate. While individual strike rates provide insights, understanding Pakistan’s collective approach and mindset is crucial. Let’s delve into the T20I batting stats since 2021.

Pakistan T20I Batting Order (Since 2021)

  • Position 1: Strike Rate – 129.83, Average – 55.67
  • Position 2: Strike Rate – 123.89, Average – 30.84
  • Position 3: Strike Rate – 115.82, Average – 21.57
  • Position 4: Strike Rate – 131.75, Average – 21.66
  • Position 5: Strike Rate – 124.44, Average – 20.36
  • Position 6: Strike Rate – 108.49, Average – 10.70

Concerns and Openers’ Dominance

Mohammad Rizwan and Babar Azam, as openers, have set records and established high partnerships. However, the team faces challenges when they fail, lacking a reliable backup to finish games. Recent reports indicate the team management’s contemplation of changing the opening combination due to perceived shortcomings in powerplay utilization.

While Pakistan boasts a formidable opening duo, weaknesses in power hitting persist, especially in the middle and lower order. Addressing these issues is crucial for success, and the team’s proactive approach in considering changes reflects a commitment to overcoming their T20I batting challenges.

ICC ban Usman khawaja.

Leave a comment